AEGiS-LT: PERSONAL HEALTH: Research Rates Spermicides on Battling Diseases Los Angeles TimesImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 1989. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Los Angeles Times main menu
DonateNow


PERSONAL HEALTH: Research Rates Spermicides on Battling Diseases

Los Angeles Times (LT) - TUESDAY September 19, 1989 Edition: Home Edition Section: View Page: 1 Pt. 5 Col. 6 Word Count: 792
Allan Parachini; Times Staff Writer


The most widely used spermicide may not offer the best protection against sexually transmitted diseases. Instead, new research data concludes, the active ingredient in only one contraceptive jelly marketed in the United States and another chemical not in any American product were the most effective in tests against diseases such as herpes, chlamydia, gonorrhea and AIDS.

The UCLA research identifies octoxynol-9, the chemical used in Ortho-Gynol Contraceptive Jelly, and benzalkonium chloride, used in Europe but not here, as superior to the most common ingredient, nonoxynol-9, that is present in such products as Gynol II, Ortho-Creme and the Today contraceptive sponge.

"On balance," the study concluded, "it would appear that octoxynol is the spermicide most effective."

The Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., the largest manufacturer of spermicides, said it could not respond to the UCLA findings because its choice of ingredients was based entirely on contraceptive effectiveness. Ortho said its product line includes both octoxynol-9 and nonoxynol-9 to offer consumers a choice in the event one ingredient or the other causes side effects.

The spermicide test results, which knowledgeable scientists said would be highly controversial, may pose a problem in fashioning a large-scale AIDS-prevention campaign. Like condoms, spermicides have never been certified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for anything but pregnancy prevention. Yet in a variety of public and consumer-oriented forums, Surgeon General C. Everett Koop and other public health officials have urged use of condoms and spermicides containing nonoxynol-9 as an AIDS-prevention technique. Now the UCLA-sponsored tests introduce the possibility that it is not the most effective agent for that purpose.

The report on spermicides was included among hundreds of pages of a federally funded condom research project headquartered at UCLA. The spermicide testing was conducted in 1987, but the report wasn't written until earlier this year.

The results, which had not been publicly released because of a variety of political and scientific intrigues, were obtained by The Times last week under the Freedom of Information Act.

Proposed Spermicide Study

The UCLA researchers initially ordered a study of spermicide effectiveness against the AIDS virus and other sexually transmitted diseases as part of a plan for a large human trial of condoms to assess their true ability to prevent AIDS. The study sought to identify the most effective condoms and spermicides on the market so such products could be distributed to research subjects.

The plan was terminated, however, when the federal government's National Institute on Child Health and Human Development withdrew financial support for the project. The institute concluded that such a large-scale human test would be too dangerous to its subjects because the high concentrations of AIDS cases in Southern California, where the research would have been done, would have made the chances of contracting the disease dangerously high if a condom failed.

In an especially controversial finding, the UCLA-sponsored research found that octoxynol-9 alone is also capable of killing the Epstein-Barr virus, linked to the mysterious disease associated with chronic fatigue and other symptoms.

In their report to the government, UCLA researchers also disclosed that laboratory notebooks containing one of two sets of AIDS test data had been mysteriously lost by a laboratory technician working on the study as a UCLA subcontractor. The loss of the data means that the HIV results "should be interpreted with caution," the report concluded. But the report also said a duplicate set of the data had been retained. And the researchers emphasized that the findings on gonorrhea and chlamydia are at odds with reports by other scientific teams, requiring further verification. But the results for other sexually transmitted diseases, the research report noted, were less open to question.

Report Conclusion

Despite the questions about spermicides and the AIDS virus, the report concluded that if the canceled human trial had been held, "the choice of octoxynol as the spermicide . . . would appear obvious: It is effective against the most agents and it is already FDA-approved."

However, the report also noted there may be "some user opposition" to octoxynol. Scientists familiar with spermicide research said there are tentative and highly controversial studies that suggest the use of octoxynol is associated with an increase in birth defects.

Researchers questioned by The Times, who agreed to comment on the condition they would not be named because they did not want to be drawn into a political or legal controversy, called the birth defect findings preliminary and possibly incorrect. Ortho has mounted vigorous legal defenses for octoxynol's safety.

Benzalkonium, the researchers concluded, would be a good second choice, but the FDA said no American product is authorized to use the chemical widely employed in France and Switzerland. A U.S. drug company, which the researchers did not identify, is believed to be testing benzalkonium for use in a contraceptive sponge.


Keywords: MEDICAL RESEARCH; VENEREAL DISEASES; BIRTH CONTROL DEVICES; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; SPERMICIDES; PRODUCT SAFETY; ORTHO PHARMACEUTICAL CORP; ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME

KWDmedicalresearch;venerealdiseases;birthcontroldevices;preventivemedicine;spermicides;productsafety;orthopharmaceuticalcorp;acquiredimmunedeficiencysyndrome
890919
LT890913


Copyright © 1989 - Los Angeles Times. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Los Angeles Times, Permissions, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053.  http://www.latimes.com.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1989. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 1989. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .