AEGiS-APPJ: Reregulation of Commercial Television: Implications for Coverage of AIDS AIDS & Public Policy JournalImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 1990. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Associated Press main menu
DonateNow
Print this Article


Reregulation of Commercial Television: Implications for Coverage of AIDS

AIDS & Public Policy Journal 5, no. 2 (Spring 1990): 82-88
Cathy Packer and Susan Kauffman


The mass media have been criticized for not doing a better job of educating the public about AIDS. During the first years of the epidemic, they were criticized for ignoring the epidemic. Although coverage has increased dramatically since the, critics have continued to ridicule the mass media for AIDS coverage that they say is too sensational or too shallow or that misrepresents the risks faced by various social groups. Some commentators have also suggested that there has not been enough coverage of AIDS. Television in particular has been criticized for skirting the sensitive sexual issues surrounding the disease. During the same six years television has covered AIDS, the medium has been gradually and substantially deregulated by the federal government. Although the FCC has deregulated many aspects of commercial broadcasting, members of Congress and some others continue to argue that broadcasters must be reregulated because they will not otherwise air socially responsible programming. Two important questions addressed here are whether, as a result of deregulation, broadcasters feel less pressure to determine and meet community problems and needs and whether they believe that reregulation would improve their coverage of AIDS. Accordingly, we surveyed television reporters and management to explore the extent to which these personnel believe that deregulation has affected television coverage of AIDS. In in-depth interviews, station personnel were asked how specific deregulatory measures have affected their station's performance in general and their AIDS coverage in particular. This study is based on interviews with the employees of commercial television stations in Boston and Raleigh-Durham.
900315
APPJ905206

Copyright © 1990 - AIDS & Public PolicyJournal. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the APPJ Permissions Desk.

AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Elton John AIDS Foundation, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1990. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1986, 1990. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .