AIDS LITIGATION PROJECT II: Table of Cases - A National Survey of Federal, State, and Local Cases Before Courts and Human Rights Commissions

Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National AIDS Program Office - August 1, 1991
Larry Gostin, Executive Director, American Society of Law & Medicine, Professor of Health Law, Harvard School of Public Health, and Lane Porter, Chair, International Health Law Committee, American Bar Association


I. AIDS EDUCATION

II. PROTECTION OF THE BLOOD SUPPLY

A. Standards of Negligence and Strict Liability

B. Discovery of the Blood Donor's Identity

C. Duty to Inform Recipients of Contaminated Blood

D. Business Concerns

III. EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEILLANCE

A. Mandatory Reporting

B. Testing/Screening

1. Informed Consent

IV. STATE RESTRICTIONS OF PERSONS: CRIMINAL LAW

A. Crime of Risking Transmission of HIV

B. Prejudice to the Fairness of the Trial

C. Compulsory Testing of Criminal Defendants

D. Sentencing for HIV Positive Offenders

E. Indictment Dismissed in Interests of Justice

F. Miscellaneous

V. STATE REGULATION OF PUBLIC PLACES

A. Bathhouses

B. Adult Book Stores/Video Stores

VI. STATE REGULATION OF PRODUCTS, FRAUD, ETC.

VII. PRIVATE TORT ACTIONS

A. Negligence

B. The "Right to Know"

C. Workers' Compensation

D. Contracts and Wills: AIDS Dementia

VIII. ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN THE COURTS

A. Right of Media to Depositions

B. Expedited Trial

C. Prejudice to Trial Court's Decision

IX. FAMILY LAW

A. Child Custody and Parental Visitations

X. CONFIDENTIALITY

A. The Media

B. Unauthorized Disclosure

C. The "Right to Know"

XI. DISCRIMINATION

A. Education

B. Employment Discrimination

C. Housing and Property

D. Public Accommodations, Commercial Establishments

E. Health Care

1. Failure to adequately treat or care for HIV-infected patients.

2. Refusal to provide premises to professionals providing services to persons infected with HIV

3. HIV-infected health care professionals: testing and limitations on the right to practice

F. Insurance

XII. FEAR OF EXPOSURE

XIII. SPECIAL POPULATIONS: PRISONS

A. State's Duty to Protect Guards and Inmates

1. Testing, Screening and Segregation

B. Civil Rights of Inmates

1. Disclosure of serological status; privacy & confidentiality

2. Testing: bodily autonomy

3. Screening and Segregation: rights to liberty, equal protection, and procedural due process, and against cruel and unusual punishment

4. Inadequate medical treatment: cruel and unusual punishment

5. Malicious Labelling a person as HIV infected

XIV. SPECIAL POPULATIONS: MILITARY

A. Discrimination

B. Court-Martial: Crime of Transmission of HIV

1. Military assault, aggravated assault, and reckless endangerment: admissability of HIV test results

C. Blood Transfusions from Military Sources

XV. HOMELESS PERSONS

XVI. RESEARCH

Table of Cases --------------

I. AIDS EDUCATION

[1]. Bean v. County of Los Angeles, A.C.L.U. AIDS Docket, July 1990.

[2]. In re Santicola, Opinion No. 12274, N.Y. Educ. Dep't, Comm'r Thomas Sobol, AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/9/90.

[3]. Ware v. Valley Stream High School, 75 N.Y.2d 114, 550 N.E.2d 420 (1989).

[4]. Fink v. Board of Educ., 542 N.Y.S.2d 918 (1989).

II. PROTECTION OF THE BLOOD SUPPLY

A. Standards of Negligence and Strict Liability

[5]. Kozup v. Georgetown Univ., 663 F. Supp. 1048 (D.D.C. 1987) aff'd in part and vacated in part 851 F.2d 437 (D.C. Cir. 1988), appeal after remand, 851 F.2d (D.C. Cir. 1990).

[6]. Doe v. Cutter Biological, No. 89-15274, 9th Cir. U.S. Ct. of App., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/11/89.

[7]. Kirkendall v. Harbor Ins., 887 F.2d 857 (8th Cir. 1989).

[8]. Ray v. Cutter Laboratory, No. 88-693-CIV-T-17A, U.S. Dist. Ct., M. Dist. Fla., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/11/90.

[9]. Smith v. Cutter Biological, No. 87-0891, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Haw., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/9/89.

[10]. Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center, 721 F. Supp. 1073 (D. Minn. 1989).

[11]. Coe v. California Super. Ct., No. A048198, Cal. Ct. of App., 1st App. Dist., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/10/90.

[12]. Cole v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank, No. 901542, San Francisco Cty. Super. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/13/90.

[13]. O'Rourke v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank, No. 887431, Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/28/89.

[14]. Dale v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank, Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/12/89.

[15]. Quintana v. United Blood Servs., 1991 WL 3771 (Colo. App.) (Jan. 17, 1991).

[16]. Miles Laboratories v. Doe, 315 Md. 704, 556 A.2d 1107 (1989).

[17]. Snyder v. Mekhjian, 244 N.J. Super. 281, 582 A.2d 307 (1990).

[18]. Crandall v. Southwest Fla. Blood Bank, 1991 WL 6315 (Fla. App. 2 Dist.) (Jan. 25, 1991).

[19]. Doe v. University Hosp., 561 N.Y.S.2d 326 (1990).

[20]. Clark v. United Blood Servs., No. CV-88-6981, Nev. 2d Jud. Dist. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/25/90.

[21]. Jeanne v. Hawkes Hosp., No. 87-CV-03-1669, Ohio Common Pleas Ct., Franklin Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/23/90.

[22]. Royer v. Miles Laboratories, No. A8711-06948, Or. Cir. Ct., Multnomah Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/9/89.

[23]. Gibson v. Methodist Hosp., 1991 WL 11344 (Tex. App.-Hous. (1 Dist.) (Jan, 31, 1991).

[24]. Jackson v. Tarrant Cty. Hosp. Dist., No. 48-95022-86, Tex. 48th Jud. Dist. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/10/90.

[25]. Longoria v. McAllen Methodist Hosp., 771 S.W.2d 663 (Tex. Ct. App. 1989).

[26]. Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood Bank, 785 P.2d 815 (Wash. 1990).

[27]. Doe v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood Bank, 780 P.2d 853 (Wash. App. 1989).

[28]. Brown v. American Nat'l Red Cross, No. B-89-1244, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Md, AIDS Litigation Reporter 10/27/89.

[29]. Anonymous Blood Recipient v. William Beaumont Hosp., 721 F. Supp. 139 (E.D. Mich. 1989).

[30]. Collins v. American Red Cross, 724 F. Supp. 353 (E.D. Pa. 1989).

[31]. Gonzalez v. Puerto Rico, 726 F. Supp. 10 (D.P.R. 1989).

[32]. Hoemke v. New York Blood Ctr., No. 88 Civ. 9029 (RO), U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. N.Y., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14099, November 22, 1989.

[33]. In Re Complex Blood Bank Litig., No. 908843, Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/9/90.

[34]. Crawford v. United Blood Servs., No. 98164, Cal. Super. Ct., Ventura Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/11/89.

[35]. Murphy v. Community Hosp. of the Monterey Peninsula, Cal. Super. Ct., Monterey Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/9/89.

[36]. Wadley Research v. Morris, 776 S.W.2d 271 (Tex. Ct. App. 1989).

[37]. Ray v. American Red Cross, The Washington Times 7/17/90.

[38]. Rogers v. Miles Laboratories, No. C88-1441D, U.S. Dist. Ct.,W. Dist. Wash., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1680, January 4, 1990.

[39]. Robinson v. Richmond Metro. Blood Serv., Law No. LR 3763-2, Richmond Cir. Ct., filed November, 1989. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va. (Settlement).

[40]. Roe v. Richmond Metropolitan Blood Service, Inc., Law No. LS -420, City of Richmond Circuit Court, filed February 5, 1990. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va..

B. Discovery of the Blood Donor's Identity

[41]. Bradway v. American Nat'l Red Cross, 132 F.R.D. 78 (N.D. Ga. 1990).

[42]. Coleman v. American Red Cross, No. 89-CV-71671-DT, U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist. Mich., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3714, April 3, 1990.

[43]. Boutte v. Blood Systems, Inc., 127 F.R.D. 122 (W.D. La. 1989).

[44]. Doe v. American Red Cross Blood Servs., 125 F.R.D. 646 (D.S.C. 1989).

[45]. Stenger v. Lehigh Valley Hosp. Ctr, 386 Pa. Super. 574, 563 A.2d 531 (1990).

[46]. LaBurre v. East Jefferson Gen. Hosp., No. 89-CC-1262, La. Sup. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/9/90.

[47]. United Blood Servs. v. The Second Judicial District Court of Nev., No. 20375, Nev. Sup. Ct., Mental & Physical Disability Law Rptr. May/June 1990.

C. Duty to Inform Recipients of Contaminated Blood

[48]. Kobey v. Alvarado Hosp., San Diego Super. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 9/8/89.

D. Business Concerns

[49]. Vansant v. American Red Cross, No. 4881, Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas, Philadelphia Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/8/90.

III. EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEILLANCE

A. Mandatory Reporting

[50]. New York State Society of Surgeons v. Axelrod, 157 A.D.2d 54, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. (1990).

B. Testing/Screening 1. Informed Consent

[51]. Doe v. Dyer-Goode, 387 Pa. Super. 151, 566 A.2d 889 (1989).

[52]. Poot v. New York Life, No. 86-2-17409-5, Wash. Super. Ct., King Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 9/8/89.

IV. STATE RESTRICTIONS OF PERSONS: CRIMINAL LAW

A. Crime of Risking Transmission of HIV

[53]. Doe v. Sercy, No. 3:88-1068-16, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. S. Car., Columbia Div. Source: LAMBDA (Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, May 3, 1988).

[54]. Brock v. State, 555 So.2d. 285 (Ala. Crim. App. 1989).

[55]. District of Columbia v. Feaster, No. F3313-89, D.C. Super. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/10/90.

[56]. State v. Sherouse, No. CR 87-7057, Fla. 9th Jud. Cir. Ct., Orange Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/14/89.

[57]. Davis v. State, 196 Ga. App. 390, 396 S.E. 2d 301.

[58]. State v. Haines, 545 N.E.2d. 834 (Ind.App. 2nd Dist. 1989).

[59]. Mississippi v. McIntyre, No. E-367(B), Hinds Cty. Cir.Ct., April 13, 1989, AIDS Policy and Law 5/3/89.

[60]. New Jersey v. Smith, Nos. 2114-8-89, I-2890-11-89, N.J. Super. Ct., Camden Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 4/27/90.

[61]. Pennsylvania v. Brown, No. 1263 of 1988, Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas, Centre Cty., AIDS Policy and Law 3/7/90.

[62]. Washington v. Stark, No. 90-1-00030-2, Wash. Super. Ct., Clallam Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/13/90.

[63]. Wisconsin v. Cummings, 451 N.W.2d 463 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989).

[64]. Scroggins v. Georgia, No. A90A1140, -41, -42, -44, Ga. Ct. of App., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/27/90.

[65]. Ada Cty. v. Thomas, No. M9002909, Idaho 4th Dist. Ct., Ada Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/8/90.

[66]. People v. Caldwell, No. 11595-89, N.Y. 1st Dist. Ct., Suffolk Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/26/89. [III.B.]

[67]. In re Osborne, No. CF-90-337, Tulsa Cty. Dist. Ct., AIDS Policy and Law 1/24/90.

[68]. State v. Weeks, Case No. 15-183, Tex. Dist. Ct., Walker Cty., AIDS Policy and Law 11/29/89.

[69]. State v. Johnson, No. 11,981, Tex. Dist. Ct., Coryell Cty., AIDS Policy and Law 11/29/89.

[70]. People v. Darby, The New York Times 7/9/90.

B. Prejudice to the Fairness of the Trial

[71]. Wiggins v. Maryland, no. 94-1988, Md. Ct. of App. Sources: LAMBDA, U.S. Law Week, March 28, 1989.

[72]. State v. Hudson, 1989 Tenn. Crim. App. Lexis 773, filed Nov. 8, 1989, appeal denied March 5, 1990, CCA no.3.

[73]. Beason v. Harcelrood, 1991 WL 5073 (Or. App.) (Jan. 23, 1991).

[74]. A.C.L.U. v. Three Judges, February 2, 1989. Source: A.C.L.U. (Press Release).

C. Compulsory Testing of Criminal Defendants

[75]. Government v. Roberts, CR No. 90-166, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. V.I., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2292, 1/18/91.

[76]. Johnetta J. v. Municipal Ct. for San Francisco, 218 Cal. App. 3d 1255, 267 Cal. Rptr. 666 (1990).

[77]. Love v. Superior Court, 276 Cal. Rptr. 600 (1990).

[78]. California v. Rice, A.C.L.U. AIDS Docket, July 1990.

[79]. People of Illinois v. Madison and People of Illinois v. Adams, Nos. 88-123613, 87-281577, Cir. Ct. Cook County, 1st Dist. Source: LAMBDA.

[80]. People v. Durham, 553 N.Y.S.2d 944 (1990).

[81]. In re Anonymous, No. A-900066, N.Y. Ct. of App., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/13/90.

[82]. Conte v. Merrell, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16245, Dec. 20, 1989.

[83]. In re Anonymous, 549 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16750 (1989).

[84]. Barrows v. Van Sciver, No. C88-05625, Utah 3rd Jud. Dist. Ct., Salt Lake Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/28/89.

[85]. State v. Farmer, 116 Wash. 2d 414, 805 P.2d 200 (1991).

D. Sentencing for HIV Positive Offenders

[86]. United States v. Depew, 751 F. Supp. 1195 (E.D. Va. 1990).

[87]. Griner v. United States, Crim. Action No. 88-40044-01, Civ. Action No. 89-3493-T, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Kansas, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1333, January 31, 1990.

[88]. Brogdon v. State, 781 P.2d 1370 (Alaska App. 1989).

[89]. State v. Priest, Nos. in-86-02-0190-R1, in-86-02-0191-R1, Sup. Ct. Del., 1989 Del. Super. LEXIS 480, Nov. 15, 1989.

[90]. New Jersey v. Bilella, No. A-5635-87T4, N.J. Super. Ct., App. Div., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/11/90.

[91]. People v. Escobales, 551 N.Y.S.2d 757 (1990).

[92]. People v. Watts, No. 2508SE, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7324, June 11, 1990.

[93]. People v. Holley, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7025, June 4, 1990.

[94]. State v. Sierra, 2003, 8504/90, 1990 WL 264642 (N.Y. Sup.) 12/12/90.

[95]. Commonwealth v. O'Neill, 573 A.2d 1112 (Pa. 1990).

[96]. State v. Guayante, 99 Ore. App. 649, 783 P.2d 1030 (1989).

E. Indictment Dismissed in Interests of Justice

[97]. People v. Shewchuk, N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty., NYLJ 4/20/90. [IV.E.]

[98]. New York v. Ortiz, Indictment Nos. 4602/88, 5984/88, N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx Cty., Crim. Term, Part 45, AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/9/90.

[99]. People v. Bordowitz, No. 90-n028423, Crim. Ct. Manhattan. Source: A.C.L.U. (Motion to Dismiss, June 14, 1990).

F. Miscellaneous

[100]. Massachusetts v. Parker, No. 890123, Boston Mun. Ct., AIDS Policy and Law 1/24/90.

[101]. People v. Alderson, 144 Misc.2d 133, 540 N.Y.S.2d 948 (1989).

[102]. Franco v. Kuffner, 543 N.Y.S.2d 753 (1989).

[103]. Allen v. Tacoma, no. 89-2-09067-3, Super. Ct. Wash., February 16, 1990. Source: A.C.L.U.

[104]. Wisconsin v. Carlson, No. 89-1620-CR, Wis.. of App., 2nd Dist., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/27/90.

[105]. Brown v. Latella, N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx Cty., AIDS Policy and Law 5/17/89.

[106]. ACT UP v. Bagley, no. 89-987-MA, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Ore. Source: A.C.L.U. (Complaint filed September 18, 1989).

[107]. South Carolina v. Edson, No. 89-GS-403065, Ct. of Gen. Sessions, AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/28/89.

[108]. Tacoma-Pierce Cty. Dir. of Health v. Tacoma, No. 89-2-09067- 3, Pierce Cty., Wash. Super. Ct., AIDS Policy and Law 11/15/89.

V. STATE REGULATION OF PUBLIC PLACES

A. Bathhouses

[109]. Marsoner v. Pima Cty., 1990 Ariz. App. Lexis 57, Ct. of App. Ariz., Feb. 27, 1990. [V.B.; V.C.]; 1991 WL 339 (Ariz. 1991).

[110]. California v. Hollywood Spa Inc., No. BC004576;

[111]. California v. Saubring Corp., No. BC004577;

[112]. California v. PI-AQUA Inc., No. BC004578; Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/27/90.

[113]. Club San Diego v. San Diego, No. 598746, Cal. Super. Ct., San Diego Cty., (Complaint filed 5/2/88).

B. Adult Book Stores/Video Stores

[114]. Bamon Corp. v. Dayton, 923 F.2d 470 (6th Cir. 1991).

[115]. Doe v. Minneapolis, 898 F.2d 612 (8th Cir. 1990).

[116]. Ellwest Stereo Theater v. Boner, 718 F. Supp. 1553 (M.D. Tenn. 1989).

VI. STATE REGULATION OF PRODUCTS, FRAUD, ETC.

[117]. Federal Trade Comm'n v. Feiler, No. CV-S-89-713-HDM (LRL), U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Nev., 57 Antitrust & Trade Reg. Report 475, 1989.

[118]. Shackil v. Lederle Laboratories, 561 A.2d 511 (N.J. 1989).

[119]. University Hosp. Laboratory v. Sullivan, No. 90-0560, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. D.C., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/11/90.

[120]. Burroughs Wellcome v. Prothrow-Stith, No. 89-1569, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Mass., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/11/89.

[121]. Lyphomed v. Professional Compounding Ctrs., No. 14-89-1792, U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. Tex., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/23/89.

[122]. New Jersey v. Central Diagnostic Laboratories, W-038366-88, N.J. Super. Ct., Middlesex Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/26/89.

VII. PRIVATE TORT ACTIONS

A. Negligence

[123]. AIDS Counseling & Testing Ctrs. v. Group W T.V., No. 89- 1492, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 4th Cir., 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8318, 17 Media L. Rep. 1893, May 22, 1990.

[124]. Sweeney v. Presbyterian/Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, No. 89 Civ. 0734 (WK), U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. N.Y., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7562, June 20, 1990.

[125]. Doyle v. Home Office Reference Laboratory, No. 89-243 ERIE, U.S. Dist. Ct., W. Dist. Pa., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5850, February 6, 1990.

[126]. Doe v. Equifax Servs., No. 88-3872, U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist. Pa., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5997, May 26, 1989.

[127]. Doe v. United States, No. 86-0179-T, U.S. Dist. Ct., R.I., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5951, May 9, 1990.

[128]. Knight v. Dep't of the Army, SA 88 CA 874, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.Dist. Tex., 1991 WL 23006 (W.D. Tex.), 1/15/91.

[129]. Moore v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co., 129 F.R.D. 551 (N.D. Ga. 1990).

[130]. Berner v. Caldwell, 543 So.2d 686 (Ala. 1989).

[131]. Edwards v. Samaritan Health Servs., No. CV-87-35695, Ariz. Super. Ct., Maricopa Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/22/90.

[132]. Doe v. Massaysay, No. 85 L 13319, Ill. Cir. Ct., Cook Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/13/90.

[133]. Bannow v. Michigan Dep't of Public Health, Nos. 88-62607-NZ, 88-12094-CM, Mich. Cir. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 10/13/89.

[134]. C.A.U. v. R.L., 438 N.W.2d 441 (Minn. App. 1989).

[135]. McCune v. Neitzel, No. 88-552, Neb. Sup. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/10/90.

[136]. DiMarco v. Hudson Valley Blood Servs., 147 A.D.2d 156 (1989).

[137]. Prego v. New York, 147 A.D.2d 165, 541 N.Y.S. 995 (1989).

[138]. Amin v. Lenox Hill Hosp., N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty., NYLJ 8/2/90.

[139]. Doe v. Sno-Isle Community Blood Bank, 776 P.2d 1361 (Wash. Ct. of App. 1989).

[140]. Brown v. Shapiro, No. 88 CV 842, Wis. Cir. Ct., Rock Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 4/13/90.

[141]. Doe v. Roe, 151 Wis. 2d 366, 444 N.W.2d 437 (1989).

[142]. Hall v. Sterling, No. A044129, Cal. Ct. of App., 1st App. Dist., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/28/89.

[143]. Taylor v. Sentara Hosps., Law No. L88-1676, Norfolk Cir. Ct., 1988. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va..

[144]. Doe v. Hyatt Hotels, No. MJG-90-1071, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Md., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/11/90.

[145]. Sullivan v. Albany Medical Ctr., No. 88-CV-1396, U.S. Dist. Ct., N. Dist. N.Y., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/25/89.

[146]. Smith v. Thomas Jefferson Hosp., No. 88-7345, U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist. Fla., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/28/89.

[147]. Ross v. Umfrey, No. Civ. 88-0571-C, U.S. Dist. Ct., W. Dist. N.Y.

[148]. Umfrey v. NeMoyer, No. 11868/88, N.Y. Sup. Ct., Erie Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/26/89.

[149]. Thomas v. Armour Pharmaceutical, J89-0157(W), U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. Miss., March 29, 1989, AIDS Policy and Law 4/5/89.

[150]. Hill v. Miller, No. CI-90-5455 #32, Orange Cty. Cir. Ct., Fla., AIDS Policy and Law 7/25/90.

[151]. Doe v. Cedars Medical Ctr., No. 90-08190, Fla. 11th Jud. Cir. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/9/90..

[152]. Torres v. Ortega, No. 89L06278, Ill. Cir. Ct., Cook Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 4/13/90.

[153]. Doe v. Little Company of Mary Hosp. & Health Care Ctrs., Ill. Cir. Ct. 90 L 1459, AIDS Policy and Law 2/7/90.

[154]. Abate v. Healthcare Int'l, 560 So.2d 812 (La. 1990).

[155]. In re Saun Miller (N.Y.C. Health & Hosp. Corp.), N.Y. Sup. Ct., AIDS Policy and Law 5/3/89.

[156]. Doe v. Price, No. 5914, Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas, Phil. Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/11/89.

[157]. Walker v. Armour Pharmaceutical, No. 5591, Pa. Ct. of Common Pleas, Philadelphia, AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/22/90.

[158]. Long v. Cutter, No. CL89000525-00, Va. Cir. Ct., Roanoke, Va., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/23/89.

[159]. Johnson v. West Virginia Univ. Hosps., No. 19768, W.Va. Sup. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/13/90.

B. The "Right to Know"

[160]. DiMarco v. Lynch Homes-Chester County, Inc., 384 Pa. Super. 463, 559 A.2d 530 (1989).

C. Workers' Compensation

[161]. American Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 2547 v. Veterans Admin. Medical Ctr., FMCS Case No. 89-23187, Iowa City, Iowa, AIDS Policy and Law 4/4/90.

[162]. Wuresthoff Memorial Hosp. v. Hurlbert, 548 So.2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. of App. 1989).

[163]. Peters v. New York City Health & Hosp. Corp., No. 22907-89, N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/8/90.

[164]. Doe v. San Francisco, No. SFO 0335097, Cal. Worker's Comp. App. Bd., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/14/89.

[165]. Doe v. Cooper Investments, No. 89-B-597. U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Colo. Source: LAMBDA (Complaint filed April 6, 1989).

D. Contracts and Wills: AIDS Dementia

[166]. Estate of Stewart McKinney, Conn. Probate Ct., Westport, Conn., AIDS Litigation Reporter 9/22/89.

[167]. Kelso v. Watson, 204 Ill. App. 3d 727, 562 N.E.2d 975 (1990).

[168]. Klein v. Devaney, NY Sup. Ct., NY Cty., AIDS Policy and Law 3/7/90.

[169]. Neill v. Performing Animal Welfare Soc'y, No. 08008, Cal. Super. Ct., Sacramento Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 4/13/90.

VIII. ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN THE COURTS

A. Right of Media to Depositions

[170]. M.A.S. v. United States, U.S. Dist. Ct., W. Dist. Mo., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9169, 16 Media L. Rep. 2135, August 7, 1989.

[171]. Flynn v. Doe, 553 N.Y.S.2d 288 (1990).

B. Expedited Trial

[172]. In Re Federated Dep't Stores, No. 1-90-00130, Document No. 1R-1, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1016, May 16, 1990.

[173]. Krishna v. Univ. of Cal. Regents, No. 898174, Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., ALR 9/8/89.

C. Prejudice to Trial Court's Decision

[174]. Minnesota v. Santos, No. 17447, U.S. Dist. Ct., 6th Dist., January 25, 1988. Source: LAMBDA.

IX. FAMILY LAW

A. Child Custody and Parental Visitations

[175]. In re J.L.O., 1197 Ga. App. 596, 398 S.E.2d 853 (1990).

[176]. Steven L. v. Dawn J., 561 N.Y.S.2d 322 (1990).

[177]. In Re Adoption of Charles B., 552 N.E.2d 884 (Ohio 1990).

[178]. J.P. v. P.W., 772 S.W.2d 786 (Mo. App. 1989).

[179]. Tubb v. Tubb, No. 3306, Tenn. Chancery Ct., Wilson Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/22/90.

[180]. In re Cassey D., 783 S.W.2d 592 (Tex. App. Houston 1st Dist. 1990).

X. CONFIDENTIALITY

A. The Media

[181]. Dorsey v. Nat'l Enquirer, Inc., No. CV 89-0209 (CBM), U.S. Dist. Ct., C. Dist. Cal., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6084, 17 Media L. Rep. 1527, February 5, 1990.

[182]. Dannemyer v. Bay Area Reporter, Source: A.C.L.U. (Press Release, June 8, 1989).

[183]. Van Straten v. Milwaukee Journal, 447 N.W.2d 105 (Wis. App. 1989).

[184]. Doe v. Judicial Qualifications Comm. of Fla., No. 89-6362- CIV-ZLOCH, U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. Fla. Source: A.C.L.U.

[185]. Lowe v. KTUL Television, No. CJ-90-02755, Okla. Dist. Ct., Tulsa Cty.

[186]. Grodin v. Marshall Bama Enterprise, No. CJ-89-5042, Okla. Dist. Ct., Tulsa Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/27/90.

B. Unauthorized Disclosure

[187]. Doe v. Barrington, 729 F.Supp. 376 (D.N.J. 1990).

[188]. Doe v. Southeastern Univ., 732 F. Supp. 7 (D.D.C. 1990).

[189]. Urbaniak v. Newton, 277 Cal. Rptr. 354 (Cal. App. 1991).

[190]. Snipes v. Mack, No. A89A0345, Ga. Ct. of App., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/12/89.

[191]. Little Bird v. Chase, A.C.L.U. AIDS Docket, July 1990.

[192]. Miller v. McAlester Regional Health Center, No. 89-83-C, U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist. of Okla., February 28, 1989, AIDS Policy and Law 4/5/89.

[193]. Herbert v. Amrex-Zetron No. C709912. Source: A.C.L.U. (Motions for and in Opposition to Protective Order, filed February 6, 1990).

[194]. Dotson v. St. Mary's Hosp., No. 90017, Conn. Sup. Ct., March 30, 1989, AIDS Policy and Law 4/19/89.

C. The "Right to Know"

[195]. Doe v. Hirsch, 731 F.Supp. 627 (S.D.N.Y. 1990).

[196]. In Re Lacy 780 P.2d 186 (Mont. 1989).

[197]. Black v. Ferris, No. 89CG 2066 69/66, Md. Cir. Ct., Baltimore Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/18/89.

XI. DISCRIMINATION

A. Education

[198]. Child v. Spillane, No. 88-2162, U.S. Ct. of App. 4th Cir., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/9/89.

[199]. Doe v. Dolton Elementary School Dist. No. 148, 694 F. Supp. 440 (N.D. Ill. 1988).

[200]. Martinez v. School Bd. of Hillsborough Cty., 87-1308-CIV-T- 17(A), U.S. Dist. Ct., M. Dist. Fla., April 26, 1989, AIDS Policy and Law 5/3/89.

[201]. Doe v. National Educ. Ctr., No. 88-7902, U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist. Pa., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/14/89.

[202]. Truax v. Washington School Dist., Source: A.C.L.U. (News clipping, November 1, 1989).

B. Employment Discrimination

[203]. Walls v. Petersburg, No. 89-2357, 4th Cir. U.S. Ct. of Appeals, Va., AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/9/90.

[204]. Cain v. Hyatt, 734 F.Supp. 671 (E.D. Pa. 1990).

[205]. Plowman v. Cheney, 714 F. Supp. 196 (E.D. Va. 1989).

[XIV.A.]

[206]. Raytheon Co. v. Fair Employ. and Hous. Comm'n 212 Cal. App. 3d 1242, 261 Cal. Rptr. 197 (1989).

[207]. Hummer v. Unemployment App. Comm'n, 1991 WL 1090 (Fla. App. 5 Dist.) (Jan. 10, 1991).

[208]. Sanchez v. Lagoudakis, No. 115526, 1990 Mich. App. LEXIS 199, June 19, 1990.

[209]. Club Swamp Annex v. White, 561 N.Y.S.2d 609 (1990).

[210]. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc. 326 N.C. 205, 388 S.E.2d 134 (1990).

[211]. Doe v. St. Luke's Hosp., No. 179373, Ohio Ct. of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/25/90.

[212]. M.A.E. v. Doe, 556 A.2d 285 (Pa. Super. 1989).

[213]. Brunner v. Al Attar 786 S.W.2d 784 (Tex. App. Houston 1990).

[214]. Benjamin R. v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 390 S.E.2d 814 (W.Va. 1990).

[215]. Kansas Comm'n on Civil Rights v. Telecheck of Kan., Inc., No. 89-C-479, Kan. Dist. Ct., Johnson Cty., April 28, 1989;

[216]. Telecheck of Kan. Inc. v. Kansas Comm'n on Civil Rights, No. 88-C-13337, Kan. Dist. Ct., Johnson Cty., April 28, 1989, AIDS Policy and Law 5/17/89.

[217]. Shawn v. Legs Co., No. 89-04346, N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/11/90.

[218]. Doe v. Office of Job Corps, No. 89-0736-MC, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Mass., April 4, 1989, AIDS Policy and Law 4/19/89.

[219]. Doe v. Alameda Contra Costa Transit Dist., No. 654177-4, Cal. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/25/89.

[220]. Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Trans., No. A64191, Or. App. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/25/90.

[221]. Mulholland v. Nordstrom, Inc., No. 90-2-08707-7, Wash. Super. Ct., King Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/11/90 (Complaint filed 5/1/90).

[222]. Jensen v. Casa Toltec Or. Comm'n of Labor. Source: A.C.L.U. and The Oregonian, December 14, 1989.

[223]. Racine Educ. Ass'n v. Racine Unified School Dist., ERD Case # 8650279, Wis. Labor & Industry Review Comm'n, AIDS Policy and Law 7/26/89.

[224]. In Re D., No. GA-00024030987-DN, November 30, 1989. Source: New York City Commission on Human Rights.

[225]. In Re A., No. GA-00167020389-DN, July 19, 1990. Source: New York City Comm'n on Human Rights.

[226]. Connecticut Human Rights Comm'n v. Respondent, No. 86-10215, Conn. Human Rts. Comm'n, September 5, 1989, AIDS Policy and Law, 10/18/89.

[227]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia, Department of Human Rights and Minority Business Development.

[228]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia, Department of Human Rights and Minority Business Development,

[229]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia, Department of Human Rights and Minority Business Development,

[230]. Complainant v.Respondent, District of Columbia Department of Human Rights and Minority Business Development.

[231]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia Department of Human Rights and Minority Business Development.

[232]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia Department of Human Rights and Minority Business Development.

[233]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia Department of Human Rights and Minority Business Development.

[234]. Chapoton v. Majestic Caterers, Chancery No. 87-688W, 16 Va. Cir. _____. Cir. Ct. Roanoke, VA, June 7, 1989; SOURCE: Ken Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va.

[235]. Goodfellow v. Quinn Patent Drawing Serv., Chancery No. 16627, Alexandria Cir. Ct., filed March, 1986. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va..

[236]. International Telemarketing v. Crowley, Civil Action No. 88- 103-A, U.S.D.C., E.D. Va., at Alexandria, transferred from District of Nebraska, February 1988. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq.. Alexandria, Va..

[237]. [UPDATE] Wolfe v. Tidewater Pizza, Chancery No. 87-662, Norfolk Cir. Ct. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va..

[238]. Shaffer v. Holiday Inn, Circuit Court. SOURCE: The Washington Blade, Washington, D.C., December 21, 1990.

C. Housing and Property

[239]. Christopher v. Barry 715 F. Supp. 1143 (D.D.C. 1989).

[240]. Moreau v. Kemp, No. C89-3469-FMS, U.S. Dist. Ct., N. Dist. Cal., September 29, 1989. Source: A.C.L.U.

[241]. Watkins v. Pillin, Cal. Super. Ct., AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/9/90.

[242]. West 22nd St. Assoc. v. Thomas, N.Y. App. Term, N.Y. Cty., AIDS Policy and Law 9/20/89.

[243]. East 10th St. Assoc. v. Estate of Stuart Goldstein, No. 38481, N.Y. Sup. Ct., App. Div., 1st Dep't, AIDS Litigation Reporter 4/13/90.

[244]. Daniels v. Christofoletti, 542 N.Y.S.2d 482 (1989).

[245]. McKinney Found. v. Fairfield, No. B 90-115, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Conn., AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/23/90.

[246]. Pruden v. Maier, No. 89-25165, Dist. Ct., Harris County, Tex. Source: LAMBDA.

[247]. In re Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Center, A.C.L.U. AIDS Docket, July 1990.

[248]. Whitman Walker Clinic v. Sibay, Chancery No. 89-957, Arlington Cir. Ct., December 1988, SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va..

[249]. ACT-UP v. Walp, No. 1:CV-91-0148, U.S. Dist. Ct., Mid. Dist. of P., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1468, 2/6/91.

D. Public Accommodations, Commercial Establishments

[250]. Jasperson v. Jessica's Nail Clinic, 216 Cal. App. 3d 1099, 265 Cal. Rptr. 301 (1989).

[251]. Kupona v. Chicago Transit Auth., No. 89-C-6908, U.S. Dist. Ct., N. Dist. Ill. Source: A.C.L.U..

[252]. Gittelson v. Jacumba Found., No. WEC 134 479, Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/23/89.

[253]. In Re B., No. GA-0002403987-DN, December 21, 1989. Source: New York City Comm'n on Human Rights.

[254]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia, Department of Human Rights and Minority Business.

E. Health Care

1. Failure to adequately treat or care for HIV-infected patients.

[255]. Weaver v. Reagen, 886 F.2d 194 (8th Cir. 1989).

[256]. Dallas Gay Alliance v. Parkland Memorial Hosp., A.C.L.U. AIDS Docket, July 1990.

[257]. Glanz v. Vernick, 750 F. Supp. 39, (Mass. 1990).

[258]. Rhodes v. Charter Hosp., 730 F. Supp. 1383 (S.D. Miss. 1989).

[259]. Wilson v. Reno County, No. 88-1641-T, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Kan., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18236, 12/19/90.

[260]. Elstein v. State Div. of Human Rights, No. 293, N.Y. Sup. Ct., App. Div., 4th Dep't, AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/8/90.

[261]. Doe v. Howard Univ., No. 88-3412[SS], U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. D.C., AIDS Litigation Reporter 10/31/89.

[262]. Walsh v. Cimanec, No. 608500, Cal. Super. Ct., San Diego Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/14/89.

[263]. Robertson v. Chen, No. 1989SP0061, Ill. Dep't of Human Relations, AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/28/89.

[264]. Nassau Cty. v. Axelrod, No. 3197/90, N.Y. Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/13/90.

[265]. Doe v. American Nursing Home, No. 89-45979, N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty., 11/2/89, AIDS Policy and Law 11/15/89.

[266]. Doe v. A Skilled Nursing Facility, No. 9K-P-D-89-135752, N.Y. Div. of Human Rts., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/13/90.

[267]. Vadnais v. Vernick, No. 89-0748-MA, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Mass. Source: A.C.L.U..

[268]. Baby Angel v. Koch, U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. N.Y. Source: A.C.L.U..

[269]. Doe v. Kahala Dental Group., No. 89-3436-11, Cir. Ct., 1st Circ., Haw. Source: A.C.L.U..

[270]. San Francisco v. California, No. 910062, Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 9/8/89.

[271]. Patient v. Ellenbogen, No. 89-848, Va. Cir. Ct., Arlington Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 9/22/89.

[272]. In Re C., No.118-90, Sup. Ct. N.Y., City of Westchester, March 21, 1990. Source: New York City Comm'n on Human Rights.

2. Refusal to provide premises to professionals providing services to persons infected with HIV

[273]. Association of Relatives and Friends of AIDS Patients v. Regulations and Permits Admin., No. 90-1672 (JAF), U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. P.R., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7529, June 13, 1990.

[274]. Seitzman v. Hudson River Assocs., 143 Misc. 2d 1068, 542 N.Y.S.2d 104 (1989).

[275]. In re Bloomingdale Conval. Ctr., 558 A.2d 19 (N.J. Super. A.D. 1989).

3. HIV-infected health care professionals: testing and limitations on the right to practice

[276]. Leckelt v. Board of Comm'rs of Hosp. Dist. No. 1, 909 F.2d 820 (5th Cir. 1990).

[277]. J.H., M.D. v. Medical Center at Princeton, No. L-88-2550, Sup. Ct. N.J. Source: A.C.L.U. (Preliminary Brief, December 13, 1988).

[278]. Kautz v. Humana Hospital-Lucerne, No. 04-86-2003, U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Office for Civil Rights, AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/25/89.

[279]. Doe v. Westchester Cty. Medical Ctr., AIDS Policy and Law 4/4/90.

[280]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia, Department of Human Rights and Minority Business Development.

[281]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia, Department of Human Rights and Minority Business.

[282]. Dawson v. Medical College of Va., Civil Action No. l89-492- R, U.S.D.C. E.D., a., at Richmond. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va..

[283]. Holt v. Ellenbogen, Chancery No. 89-848, Arlington Cir. Ct., filed October, 1989. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq.,Alexandria, Va..

[284]. Parks v. Virginia Dep't of Rehab. Servs., SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va..

[285]. Doe v. Primary Care Corporation, Civil Action No. 86-377-A, U.S.D.C. E.D. Va. at Alexandria, filed April, 1986. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Esq., Alexandria, Va..

F. Insurance

[286]. William Penn Life Ins. v. Sands, 912 F.2d 1359 (11th Cir. 1990).

[287]. Fernandez v. Bankers Nat'l Life, No. 89-5485, 11th Cir. U.S. Ct. of App., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/10/90.

[288]. Mele v. First Colony Life Ins., No. 88-3297, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Columbia, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3726, April 2, 1990, Decided; As Amended April 17, 1990.

[289]. Murphy v. State Farm Ins., No. C88-4940 SC, U.S. Dist. Ct., N. Dist. Fla., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/25/89.

[290]. Elder v. SMA Life Assurance Co., Civ. No. 88-1261-FR, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Or., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4030, April 2, 1990.

[291]. Gardner v. Rainbow Lodge, No. H-88-1705, U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. Tex., AIDS Litigation Reporter 6/8/90.

[292]. McGann v. H & H Music Co., No. H-89-1995, U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. Tex., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/10/90.

[293]. Cheney v. Bell Nat'l Life, 556 A.2d 1135 (Md. 1989)

[294]. Health Ins. Assoc. of America v. Corcoran, 154 A.D.2d 61, 551 N.Y.S.2d 615 (1990).

[295]. Bradley v. Empire Blue Cross, Sup. Ct. N.Y. Sources: A.C.L.U., LAMBDA Press Release, The New York Times, July 31, 1990.

[296]. Doe v. Cooper Investment, No. 89-B-597, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Colo., May 5, 1989, AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/26/89.

[297]. National Gay Rights Advocates v. Great Republic Ins., No. 857323, Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/25/90.

[298]. Lewis v. Physician's Health Plan Inc., CA No. 89-0530-A, U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist. Va., April 17, 1989, AIDS Policy and Law 4/19/89.

[299]. Rosco v. Great Republic Ins., No. 919372, Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty.

[300]. White v. Great Republic Ins., No. 919933, Cal. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 7/13/90.

[301]. National Gay Rights Advocates v. Commercial Sales and Serv. Trust, Cal. Dep't of Ins., AIDS Policy and Law 8/9/89.

[302]. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America v. Smyth, Nos. 07899/87 & 07900/87, Sup. Ct. N.Y. Source: LAMBDA.

[303]. Complainant v. Respondent, District of Columbia, Department of Human Rights and Minority Business.

[304]. Insured v. Maccabees Life Ins., Civil action No. 89-562-A, U.S.D.C. E. D. Va., at Alexandria, Va., tried October 23, 1989. SOURCE: Kenneth Labowitz, Alexandria, Va..

XII. FEAR OF EXPOSURE

[305]. Burk v. Sage Products, 747 F. Supp. 285 (E.D. Pa. 1990). [306]. Ross v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 219 Cal. App. 3d 389, 268 Cal. Rptr. 102 (1990).

[307]. Palmetto Gen. Hosp. v. Green, 559 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 1990).

[308]. People v. Meeboer, 449 N.W.2d 124 (Mich. App. 1989).

[309]. Hare v. State, N.Y. Ct..Cls, AIDS Policy and Law, 4/19/89. [310]. New York v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth., No. 41627/90, N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 4/27/90.

[311]. Elliott v. Dugger, 542 So.2d 392 (Fla. App. 1st Dist. 1989).

XIII. SPECIAL POPULATIONS: PRISONS

A. State's Duty to Protect Guards and Inmates

1. Testing, Screening and Segregation

[312]. Walker v. Summer, 917 F.2d 382 (9th Cir. 1990).

[313]. Harris v. Thigpen, 727 F. Supp. 1564 (M.D. Ala. 1990).

[314]. Muhamad v. Frame, No. 87-5282 slip op. (E.D. Pa. Sept. 11, 1987)

[315]. Farmer v. Moritsugu, No. 89-C-926-S, U.S. Dist. Ct., W. Dist. Wis., AIDS Litigation Reporter 5/11/90.

[316]. Hays v. Idaho Corrections Dep't, Nos. HC-2799, HC-2800, Idaho 4th Dist. Ct., Ada Cty., AIDS Litigation Reporter 10/13/89.

[317]. Williams v. United States Parole Comm'n, 875 F.2d 869 (6th Cir. 1989).

[318]. Parker v. Evans, No. 1:89-CV-1604-MHS, U.S. Dist. Ct., N. Dist. Ga., AIDS Litigation Reporter 8/11/89.

B. Civil Rights of Inmates

1. Disclosure of serological status; privacy & confidentiality

[319]. Rodriguez v. Coughlin, No. CIV-87-1577E, U.S. Dist. Ct., W. Dist. N.Y., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15898, June, 2, 1989.

[320]. State Dep't of Public Health v. Wells, No. 6975, 1989 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 290, Sept. 13, 1989.

[321]. Winters v. Smith, No. 01-89-01033-cv, 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 2733, Nov. 2, 1989.

[322]. Doe v. Evans, No. 1:88-cv-1752-MHS (N.D.Ga) SOURCE: National Prison Project

[323]. Doe v. Clark Cty., No. C-89-460TB, U.S. Dist. Ct., W. Dist. Wash., AIDS Litigation Reporter 9/8/89..

2. Testing: bodily autonomy

[324]. Dunn v. White, 880 F.2d 1188 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. denied Feb. 5, 1990.

3. Screening and Segregation: rights to liberty, equal protection, and procedural due process, and against cruel and unusual punishment

[325]. Slatton v. Dallman, 876 F.2d 104 (6th Cir. 1989).

[326]. Welch v. Sheriff of Lubbock Cty., 734 F. Supp. 765 (N.D. Tex. 1990).

[327]. Ramos v. Lamm, No. 77-C-1093, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Colo., AIDS Litigation Reporter 3/23/90.

[328]. Hochman v. Rafferty, Civ. Action No. 89-2398, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. N.J., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16577, October 19, 1989.

[329]. Brickus v. Frame, Civ. Action No. 89-2490, U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist. Pa., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8510, July 24, 1989.

[330]. Portee v. Tollison, 1990 W.L. 212315 (D.S.C.) (Dec. 14, 1990).

[331]. Deutsch v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 89 CIV. 3544 (RJW), U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. N.Y., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5025, May 2, 1990.

[332]. Berry v. Elliot, No. 89-1172, 8th Cir. U.S. Ct. of App., AIDS Litigation Reporter 9/8/89.

[333]. Doe X6 v. California Dep't of Corr., No. SACU 89-598-JSL, U.S. Dist. Ct., C. Dist. Cal. Source: A.C.L.U..

[334]. Smith v. Meachum, No. H-87-221-JAC, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Conn., AIDS Litigation Reporter 4/13/90.

[335]. Macke v. Cowles, No. 86-4447 -CV-C-5 (W.D. Mo.). SOURCE: National Prison Project.

4. Inadequate medical treatment: cruel and unusual punishment

[336]. Lind v. Philadelphia, 899 F.2d 1218 (3rd Cir. 1990), AIDS Policy and Law 4/18/90.

[337]. Gomez v. United States, 899 F.2d 1124 (11th Cir. 1990).

[338]. Kaminsky v. Rosenblum, No. 88 Civ. 1840 (PKL), U.S. Dist. Ct., S. Dist. N.Y., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6122, May 22, 1990.

[339]. Wilson v. Franceschi, No. 89-739-CIV-T-17C, U.S. Dist. Ct., M. Dist. Fla., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16798, December 22, 1989.

[340]. Maynard v. New Jersey, 719 F. Supp. 292 (D.N.J. 1989).

[341]. Inmates v. Cuomo No. 90-CU-252, U.S. Dist. Ct., N. Dist. N.Y. Source: A.C.L.U. (Complaint filed March 6, 1990).

[342]. Hawley v. Evans, 716 F. Supp. 601 (N.D. Ga. 1989). SOURCE: Alexa Freeman, J.D., National Prison Project.

5. Malicious Labelling a person as HIV infected

[343]. Delconte v. Whitpain Township Police Dep't, Civ. Action No. 89-6107, U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist. of PA., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10384, September 1, 1989.

[344]. Bird v. Figel, 725 F. Supp. 406 (N.D. Ind. 1989).

XIV. SPECIAL POPULATIONS: MILITARY

A. Discrimination

[345]. Doe v. Garrett, No. 89-3404, U.S. Ct. of App., 11th Cir., 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10076, June 25, 1990.

[346]. Doe v. Marsh, Civ. Action No. 89-1383-OG, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Columbia, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1442, February 8, 1990.

[347]. Doe v. New York Div. of Military and Naval Affairs, A.C.L.U. AIDS Docket, July 1990.

[348]. Brisbois v. Marsh, Sources: A.C.L.U. and Newsday, February 27, 1989.

[349]. United States v. Dumford, 30 M.J. 137 Court of Military Appeals (C.M.A.), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 150 (1990). SOURCE: Army Office of The Judge Advocate General.

B. Court-Martial: Crime of Transmission of HIV

1. Military assault, aggravated assault, and reckless endangerment: admissability of HIV test results

[350]. United States v. Johnson, 30 M.J. 53, 1990 CMA LEXIS 543, April 12, 1990.

[351]. Navy v. Joseph, AIDS Litigation Reporter 4/27/90. [352]. United States Navy v. Woods, U.S. Navy Court-Martial, Norfolk, Va, AIDS Litigation Reporter 10/13/89.

[353]. United States v. Stewart, 29 M.J. 92, 1989 CMA LEXIS 3506, September 28, 1989.

C. Blood Transfusions from Military Sources

[354]. Gaffney v. United States, Civ. Action No. 88-1457-2, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. of Mass., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5184, April 26, 1990.

[355]. Johnson v. United States, Civ. Action No. 89-2633, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Columbia, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4681, April 12, 1990.

[356]. Kipp v. United States, CV 90-0-581 (D. Neb). SOURCE: Army Office of The Judge Advocate General.

[357]. C.R.S. v. United States, No. 4-90-299 (D. Minn.).SOURCE: Army Office of The Judge Advocate General.

XV. HOMELESS PERSONS

[358]. Williams v. Department of Human Servs., 561 A.2d 244 (N.J. 1989).

[359]. Mixon v. Grinker, No. 39815, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6766, June 5, 1990.

XVI. RESEARCH

[360]. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Bowen, 722 F. Supp. 787 (D.D.C. 1989).

[361]. E.I. DuPont v. HEM Research, Inc., 1989 Del. Ch. LEXIS 132, October 13, 1989; 1989 Del. Ch. LEXIS 146, November 6, 1989.

910801
ALAW0007


Copyright (c) 1991 - CDC National AIDS Clearinghouse. Reproduced with permission.

ÆGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Roxane Laboratories, Inc., iMetrikus, Inc., the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1991. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

ÆGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1988, 2000. ÆGiS & the Sisters of Saint Elizabeth of Hungary. All materials appearing on ÆGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of ÆGIS and the Sisters of Saint. Elizabeth of Hungary, or the party credited as the provider of the content.