Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 2000. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
 |
Antivir Ther. 1998;3(3):147-58. Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE MED/20146713
D'Amato RM; D'Aquila RT; Wein LM; Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of; Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate four strategies for monitoring plasma HIV RNA levels and/or resistance genotypes to decide when to change antiretroviral therapy. The strategies include: (i) 1997 guidelines recommending a therapy switch when plasma RNA exceeds a threshold level; (ii) a viral load policy, using a fixed increase in viral load as the trigger; (iii) a genotype policy, requiring a smaller viral rebound than (ii) and detection of genotypic resistance before switching; and (iv) a proactive policy, switching drug regimens at a predetermined time if viral load has not rebounded. DESIGN AND SETTING: A Monte Carlo simulation tracks patients' viral loads and presence of opportunistic infection during therapy. The model uses clinical and virological data and statistical variation in patient parameters for the evaluation of therapeutic strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To determine which strategies minimize viral rebound detection delay while maintaining a low (prespecified) probability of switching therapy before rebound. RESULTS: 1997 Guidelines and the viral load policy create lengthy delays in detection of rebound, particularly when patients are drug-naive and the detection limit of the viral load assay is 500 copies/ml. A detection limit of 20 copies/ml decreases this delay substantially. Genotyping achieves only minor additional delay reductions. Of the strategies tested, the proactive policy leads to the shortest delays. CONCLUSIONS: This model indicates that prolonged periods may be required for viral load to rebound to detectable levels following prolonged suppression. Proactive switching produces the best outcome in our model because it may reduce the duration of viral replication under pressure of a failing regimen before detection of viral rebound. This strategy should be evaluated in clinical trials.
Copyright © 2000 - National Library of Medicine. Reproduced under license with the National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2000. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2000. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .