Mandatory prenatal screening for the human immunodeficiency virus: the experience in south-eastern France of a national policy, 1992-1994 [see comments] NLM AIDSLINE Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 1998. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.

Click here to return to AIDSLINE main menu
DonateNow
Print this Article


Mandatory prenatal screening for the human immunodeficiency virus: the experience in south-eastern France of a national policy, 1992-1994 [see comments]

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Mar;105(3):269-74. Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE MED/98194179
Rey D; Carrieri MP; Obadia Y; Pradier C; Moatti JP; Regional Center for Disease Control of South-Eastern France,; Marseille.


Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the 1993 French National Policy which made it mandatory to offer screening for the presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to all pregnant women who planned to give birth, although women remained free to refuse the test. DESIGN: Successive surveys in April 1992 and May 1994 in south-eastern France. Logistic regressions were performed to identify factors which affected access to HIV testing for women who gave birth and those who terminated their pregnancy, and for each year of study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attitudes and access to HIV testing among pregnant women, irrespective of pregnancy outcome. SETTING: All obstetrics and gynaecology departments and abortion clinics in the region. POPULATION: 3497 women in 1992 (2775 who were delivered and 722 who chose termination) and 3407 in 1994 (2701 who were delivered and 766 who chose termination). The response rates were 82% and 88%, respectively. RESULTS: In 1994 of women who were delivered, 73% had an HIV test, compared with 63% in 1992 (P < 0.001); however of women who terminated their pregnancy, only 28% had an HIV test, compared with 24.5% in 1992 (P not significant), although they were more at risk for HIV infection. Socioeconomic differences affecting access to testing were reduced between 1992 and 1994, but only among women who gave birth. CONCLUSION: Introduction of a policy which makes it mandatory to offer HIV screening to all women who intended to have their baby improved access to screening but did not improve the rate of preventative counselling. A mandatory requirement to offer HIV screening should be extended to women who request termination of pregnancy.
Keywords: *HIV Infections/PREVENTION & CONTROL *Mass Screening/METHODS *Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/PREVENTION & CONTROL *Prenatal Diagnosis/METHODS

KWDhivinfections/prevention&controlKWDmassscreening/methodsKWDpregnancycomplications,infectious/prevention&controlKWDprenataldiagnosis/methods
Comment in: Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998 Mar;105(3):249-51
980730
M9871382


Copyright © 1998 - National Library of Medicine. Reproduced under license with the National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Elton John AIDS Foundation, Gill Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Quest Diagnostics, Roche and Trimeris, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1998. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 1998. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .