Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 1989. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
[Refusal of blood because of being Jehovah's witnesses or for fear of AIDS. Deontologic and legal aspects]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1988;17(8):965-80. Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE MED/89176003 Soutoul JH; Pierre F; Clinique Gynecologique Universitaire et Maternite du Beffroi,; Departement de Clinique Gynecologique et Obstetricale de la; Reproduction du C.H.U., Tours.
Abstract:
Difficult new medical and professional ethical problems have arisen by an increase in the number of patients refusing blood transfusion or the use of blood derivatives because of religious convictions. In particular Jehovah's Witnesses and patients frightened of catching AIDS and other diseases transmitted by blood are involved. Because of this it is necessary to consider how to prevent legal actions which may be brought under the heading of death by negligence or by failing to give correct treatment for a patient in danger, particularly when the case is of death that could be connected with failure to resuscitate a patient where the basic treatment would be giving blood. The authors have analysed article by article of the Code of Medical Deontology of 1975 and have found ambiguities, not to say apparent contradictions, in the recommendations given to doctors who find themselves confronted by patients who have refused in this way needed treatment for haemorrhagic shock, as can occur particularly in obstetrics and gynaecology. The law is extremely weak in this matter because the Appeal Court has never taken a clear position in regard to the responsibility the doctor has when he finds himself with a patient who has refused the correct treatment. The authors have been driven to research through a large bibliography of medico-legal works to find out what doctors should do when they are confronted by patients who refuse the correct treatment by they adults or infants or mentally incapacitated. The practical advice that ends this analysis should make it possible for the readers to adopt a compromise way of dealing with these situations that at the same time accords with the normal medical contract between patients and doctor and the dignity that should be afforded to the patient but also the safety of the patient. This is done by avoiding on the one hand total rejection of the legitimate personal convictions of the patient but also on the other hand not accepting too readily these convictions, which could lead to being held responsible for failure to carry out one's obligations to patients or to just leaving the patient to her circle, stepping aside from caring for her.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Keywords: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/*TRANSMISSION *Blood Transfusion/ADVERSE EFFECTS *Christianity Defensive Medicine English Abstract *Ethics, Medical France Human Informed Consent/LEGISLATION & JURISPRUD Jurisprudence JOURNAL ARTICLE
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 1989. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
