The Washington Blade - August 13, 1999
Kai Wright
The Senate passed the Republican bill on July 15, by a 53 to 47 vote. The primary differences for people with HIV and AIDS between that bill and the measure pushed by Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) involved a patient's ability to sue his or her HMO, a patient's right to use a specialist as a primary care provider, access to greater varieties of prescription drugs, and coverage for participation in clinical trials. The Democratic proposal offered each of these rights, while the Republican bill offered none of them.
Another critical dispute in Hill debates on the issue have been whether the physician or the HMO holds the final authority in determining what treatments are "medical necessities." The Democratic version gave the final say in that decision to individual doctors, the GOP version left the power to define a medical necessity with the HMO.
Jeff Crowley, deputy director of the National Association for People With AIDS, said the same divisions will exist between the House Democratic and Republican versions. The House has not begun floor debate on HMO reform and it was unclear this week whether or not they would take up the sticky issue before going on recess in early August.
990813
WB990803
The Washigton Blade, Inc., 1408 U St., N.W., 2nd Floor, Washington, D.C. 20009-3916
Copyright © 1999 - The Washinton Blade. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of The Washington Blade content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of the Blade. The Washington Blade shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. The Washington Blade